[Update] Progressives will continue to spin everything about Sarah Palin, continuing with the personal attacks on here and her family in true Saul Alinsky tradition. We need to let her know that we celebrate here decision to go full 50 states in bringing her brand of politics to America. She will have my support no matter what she decides to do. 

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

When I first saw this article in the NYT's I decided that after I enter the post I would follow the names of some of the people interviewed in the article. It's fairly easy, when you get enough information like:

“When I first heard about Palin, I was impressed,” said Pamela Moore, a mother of two from Birmingham, Ala.,

Then all you have to do is enter the info in a Google search window as "Pamela Moore and Birmingham" and hit the 'Enter' button on your kryboard. I followed this article all the way to The Austrailian and here is what I found, it is being blogged all over:

With five children, including an infant with Down syndrome and, as the country learned Monday, a pregnant 17-year-old, Ms. Palin has set off a fierce argument among women about whether there are enough hours in the day for her to take on the vice presidency, and whether she is right to try.

I’d like to see somebody stand in her way.

“When I first heard about Palin, I was impressed,” said Pamela Moore, a mother of two from Birmingham, Ala. But upon reading that Ms. Palin’s special-needs child was three days old when she went back to work, Ms. Moore began questioning the governor’s judgment. Partly as a result, she plans to vote for Senator Barack Obama.

Yes. Always at home is Obama. And Michelle. Why, she’s hardly been seen.

“You can juggle a BlackBerry and a breast pump in a lot of jobs, but not in the vice presidency,” said Christina Henry de Tessan, a mother of two in Portland, Ore., who supports Mr. Obama.

So that’s two Obama supporters not voting for McCain, and the Times manages to blame it on the working Mum.

I guess you just can't hide from the Internet (Good line, maybe I can sell it for a TV add)

[Editor's Note] For almost 18 months the New York Obama Times has refused to vett (as in examine the background of) any of the most liberal presidential hopefuls this country has ever seen, but now that John McCain picks his VP they are practically telling us which side of the plate she places her fork and knife, left or right. Because they are so far from mainstream America (just like the DNC leaders) they assume that the newly invigorated conservative voters will now reject her (and therefore the Republican Party). This because her 17 year-old daughter is 5 months pregnant and will soon marry her teenage boyfriend. 

Let me give the Liberal-Biased press a lesson in conservatism. We would not condemn or reject her because she is following her conservative Christian values and beliefs; her daughter is having the baby and will soon marry her baby's father. When we look at conservatives, evangelicals, Christians in general; we are the most forgiving people in the world. What we do find hardest to forgive is hypocrisy. Her daughter is having a baby, we do not condemn this, we celebrate it. I have heard some people actually calling her Pro-Choice; as she has chosen to have a baby, not 'abort' the life of a human.  Because Sarah Palin is supporting her daughter we do not comdem her; again the word celebrate comes to mind.

The weekend after her selection the McCain campaign received over 10 million dollars in contributions. Social conservatives are On Fire.

I really think they don't get it, so I am sure that reading this, most liberals will assume that I have no idea what I am talking about. After all, they assume that THEY are mainstream America. I am just someone who lives in Fly-Over country. God Bless America.


The New York Times. ST. PAUL — A series of disclosures about Gov. Sarah Palin, Senator John McCain's choice as running mate, called into question on Monday how thoroughly Mr. McCain had examined her background before putting her on the Republican presidential ticket.

You can read the rest of the NYT's article here. You can add a comment here.