Billions of Barrels Could Mean Trillions of Government Dollars; Media AWOL

[John K. Matyi} This is the answer for John McCain as to how he will be able to both lower taxes and also insure increased income for the government (to pay off all this debt). We know that Obama is in the tank for the radical environmentalists, so he will only drill (if at all) 100 miles off the coast (most of the oil is within 50 miles). I sure wish I had a direct link to the McCain ad people. Maybe if we send this post to our elected officials they might begin to get the word out. But we need to do it now. There is not a lot of time left.

Billions of Barrels Could Mean Trillions of Government Dollars; Media AWOL



By Tom Blumer | bio
October 5, 2008 - 09:49 ET

Congressman John Peterson (R-PA) has assembled information about this. The numbers are stunning.

Old Media's coverage of the recently-lifted executive and congressional bans on offshore exploration and drilling for oil and natural gas largely overlooked an important element that should have been very relevant to the discussion.

Supporters of lifting the bans surely share much of the blame for only rarely citing it. Though they have frequently noted the hundreds of billions of dollars a years annually sent overseas to pay for oil that could have been extracted here, they have mostly missed a golden opportunity to tell the American people what over a quarter-century of drilling bans has cost the government and taxpayers. They also generally failed to tell us about the windfall that awaits if the end of the offshore and other bans finally leads to appropriately aggressive use of this country's God-given resources.

But if we had inquisitive financial reporters in the business press who were interested in information relevant to the "Drill Baby Drill" debate instead of merely repackaging the press releases they received from those on both sides (the sole exception I found was this Wall Street Journal editorial), many more Americans would have long ago learned about what follows.

Congressman John Peterson (R-PA) has assembled information about this. The numbers are stunning.

In a PDF available at the congressman’s home page (at “Charts and Other Useful Information”), he tells us that “the United States is the only industrialized nation in the world which prohibits offshore exploration and production of domestic energy.” In other words, everyone else is talking the talk, while we're the only ones walking the walk. Translation: We've been suckered by environmentalists and the "not in my back yard" crowd into doing something no one else in the rest of the world will do.

The government collects royalties on oil and natural gas when it is extracted. Peterson’s office obtained information from the Minerals Management Service and the Energy Information Agency showing that the average offshore royalty rate, which is based on market prices of the resources when extracted, is 15.17%.

Earlier this summer, the Congressman's office prepared this summary (available in HTML format here) of how much royalty money is just sitting there offshore:


Click here to read the rest of this article, this is a must read. In the 'Old World Media,' Journalism is dead (and we should have a wake and then bury them). This will not be in the MSM so we need to get this information out to as many people, blogs, elected officials, and friends/family members as possible. You can search for contact information on this link: Members of Congress & Congressional District Maps





 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this post.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.